Thursday, December 31, 2099

The Examined Life Discussion Group

The Examined Life discussion group at the Providence Athenaeum explores how literature relates to life. The monthly meetings consider readings selected from a variety of literary classics, including novels, short stories, plays, poems, and essays. In each session, we first analyze the reading and then evaluate the reading’s relevance to our lives today. 

The conversations probe big questions: What makes a life meaningful? Why are we here? Where are we going and how can we get there? What insights can we derive from the perspectives and voices of canonical authors? Great literature makes visible what we may not apprehend in our own lives and shows us how we are connected in more ways than we have realized. 

The Examined Life Discussion Group is curated and led by Robert Allio, an Athenaeum member with a continuing interest in the humanities. We draw our inspiration from Socrates:



I say again that the greatest good of man is daily to converse about virtue...and that the life that is unexamined is not worth living.


Friday, April 8, 2016

post Nostalgia and Swimmer aphorisms

  • The richness of life lies in the memories we have forgotten…
  • The past is interesting only if you have a rich present.
  • And suddenly you’ve got this huge new territory inside you, which is the past—which wasn’t there before.  A new source of strength…

Sunday, April 3, 2016

More on Hemingway--from Liesl Schillinger


Hemingway’s sensibility struck my teenage self as inarticulate and sexist.
                  The first time I encountered a reputedly great novel that I could not stand was in my senior year of high school. My A.P. English teacher had assigned “For Whom the Bell Tolls,” by Ernest Hemingway, and as I read it, I felt boredom, then anger, then incredulity. The main characters — the macho Robert Jordan; his compliant love interest, Maria; and his friend, the “ugly” virago Pilar — seemed to have been slapped like paper dolls against the background of the Spanish Civil War. Hemingway’s sensibility struck my teenage self as inarticulate and sexist. Stunned that this book and its author had earned such acclaim, I went to the library to hunt for clues to Hemingway’s psyche, hoping to understand his motivations, if not his fame.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Pablo Neruda

You start dying slowly      
You start dying slowly
 if you do not travel,
if you do not read,
If you do not listen to the sounds of life,
 If you do not appreciate yourself.
You start dying slowly
When you kill your self-esteem;
When you do not let others help you.
 You start dying slowly
 If you become a slave of your habits,
Walking everyday on the same paths…
 If you do not change your routine,
If you do not wear different colours
Or you do not speak to those you don’t know.
 You start dying slowly
If you avoid to feel passion
And their turbulent emotions;
Those which make your eyes glisten
 And your heart beat fast.
You start dying slowly
If you do not change your life
 when you are not satisfied with your job,
 or with your love,
If you do not risk what is safe for the uncertain,
 If you do not go after a dream,
If you do not allow yourself, At least once in your lifetime,
To run away from sensible advice…

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

It's never too late

An 89-year-old guitar maker is proof that age isn't a barrier when it comes to self discovery.                

               Watch this:
               http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/421509/the-joy-of-a-never-ending-search-for-hobbies/

Monday, December 21, 2015

Life as a penal colony, according to Schopenhauer's gloomy outlook

On the Sufferings of the World

 Unless suffering  is the direct and immediate object of
life, our existence must entirely fail of its aim. It is absurd
to look upon the enormous amount of pain that abounds
everywhere in the world, and originates in needs and necessities
inseparable from life itself, as serving no purpose
at all and the result of mere chance. Each separate
misfortune, as it comes, seems, no doubt, to be something
exceptional; but misfortune in general is the rule.
I know of no greater absurdity than that propounded by
most systems of philosophy in declaring evil to be negative
in its character. Evil is just what is positive; it makes
its own existence felt. Leibnitz  is particularly concerned
to defend this absurdity; and he seeks to strengthen his
position by using a palpable and paltry sophism.[1]  It is
the good which is negative; in other words, happiness and
satisfaction always imply some desire fulfilled, some state
of pain brought to an end.
This explains the fact that we generally find pleasure to
be not nearly so pleasant as we expected, and pain very
much more painful.
The pleasure in this world, it has been said, outweighs the
pain; or, at any rate, there is an even balance between the
two. If the reader wishes to see shortly whether this statement
is true, let him compare the respective feelings of
two animals, one of which is engaged in eating the other.
The best consolation in misfortune or affliction of any
kind will be the thought of other people who are in a still
worse plight than yourself; and this is a form of consolation
open to every one. But what an awful fate this means
for mankind as a whole!
We are like lambs in a field, disporting themselves under
the eye of the butcher, who chooses out first one and then
another for his prey. So it is that in our good days we
are all unconscious of the evil Fate may have presently in
store for us--sickness, poverty, mutilation, loss of sight or
reason.